In this discussion, Dr. SHIVA shares results from CytoSolve’s Molecular Systems Biology Analysis of comparing Watermelon Seeds on Cardiovascular Health The discussion is a SYSTEMS ANALYSIS. Many “health gurus” simply are Pro- and Anti- about a particular food. This is a reductionist approach that creates confusion. They have little idea of HOW the food behaves at the molecular systems level due to their ignorance in a SYSTEMS foundation to thinking.
The original research in this video is made possible by generous contributions from supporters of the Dr.SHIVA Truth Freedom Health® movement. Please contribute so we may continue to bring you such original research, valuable education, and innovative solutions.
Rough Transcript (Auto-Generated)
alzheimer, people, amyloid, science, beta, paper, called, research, ash, big, published, movement, tenure, researcher, cassava, mafia, nih, images, oligomers, money
Good evening, everyone, it is 6pm Hope everyone’s doing well. We’re gonna have a conversation today, where I’m going to share with you some very important of investigative reporting that came out of Science Magazine. And it’s really about how the research over the last close to almost two decades and Alzheimer’s research was based on a paper. And that paper in written in 2006, which was cited nearly 2300 times and we’ll talk about what a citation is. It’s had some very profound effects on really misdirecting the Alzheimer’s research. This has been reported by science, and to US taxpayers, it’s cost at a minimum of about a quarter of a billion dollars all the way up to several billion dollars. And what I want to share with you today is as we review this, we bring this title up it’s it’s the title is how Alzheimer’s, fake science academic mafia, and by the way they use the word amyloid mafia in the paper that’s crediting them in the science article, steal billions. And what we must do the the investigative journalist to share this research doesn’t give a solution, which is what we’re going to talk about. But let’s wait for people to join us how people are doing. Hello from Florida. Good to have you. Good evening. Great to have you. Thank you, Dr. Shiva. Wonderful. And I would really suggest all of you who are interested in science and making sure there’s fairness in science, share this article that are shared this video that I’m going to do today. And I think it’ll help a lot of you really understand what’s going on. So before we start at a very high level, what you’re going to learn today is how the system of quote unquote scientific research works. Most people do not understand how there is literally a quote unquote mafia, between what what articles make it out there, what don’t. And then you’re also going to learn the motivating factor that drives this huge, huge drive to get papers published in Science, and who profits from that. So you’re going to learn that because without that deep systems understanding, it’s hard to recognize the science, the quote, unquote, the science that we come out, what was really the momentum that drove a lot of that science, okay, what is the motivating factors that drive that science, and you’re gonna learn that, which is really not known by the vast amount of public. So by the time someone says, oh, you know, you have to, let’s say, excuse me take this vaccine, or you have to, you know, take this drug, or this is a reason that people get this disease and don’t take that herb or don’t do this, right. There’s a whole fundamental system, which is controlling this scientific framework. And so we’re going to learn that. Okay, so let me to those of you joining today’s today’s video is going to be on how Alzheimer’s, fake science academia, stole billions. And what we have to do so let me as we go into this, let me first of all, invite everyone to go to VA shiva.com. So you can understand more about all the different things we do as a part of our truth, freedom and health effort. And I also encourage all of you to go to truth freedom health.com, or va shiva.com/join. They sent you go to the same site. And when you go to that site, you will learn more about our movement for truth, freedom and health. It’s a movement, it’s an infrastructure. And I hope all of you take a little bit of time to go check it out, because I think it’ll give you a framework on how we can understand it. And it’s really your movement. And all of the videos we do all of the research we do is supported by your contributions. And those of you if you contribute 100 or more, you get access to all of these wonderful gifts. You don’t have to by the way, donate anything but I just want to let you know about that. You get access to all these gifts. You can be on the warrior Scholar Program. You get books, you get tools, and I’ll come back to that. Those of you who want to sort of
contribute 25 or $99 you get all these other Gifts again, we don’t like to take anything for nothing. And those of you don’t want to give anything, but just want to be part of the movement, you also get gifts anyway. So take advantage of that it’s really for you this movement is really was created to support your advancement in learning the science of systems. And when you learn that science, all of you also get access to the course. But more importantly, you’re going to understand the inner connection between truth, freedom and health. And we’re going to learn that right now. In this Alzheimer’s mafia that took place, anyone else who brought really alternative ideas, most of those things, were shunned, and frankly, in some way censored because there was so much money in promoting one idea of why Alzheimer’s was being caused. So the science suffered, and people’s health suffered, you’ll realize that, you know, not one drug has really been effective against Alzheimer’s, in spite of the billions and billions that have gone into it from taxpayer funding, because of this kind of fake science that has been taking place. And we’ll get into that. All right. And by the way, every Thursdays at 11am, we did an orientation today, it was really well attended, and an 8pm. Tonight, people have a chance to interact with me and other members of truth, freedom and health. So if you want to sign up, just go to wvsu.com/orientation and sign up. Alright, so where does our story begin? Okay, so some of you have made an heard of a company, but most of you probably have not have a company. By the way, Ukraine and Russia isn’t really that well reported. It’s a little bit reported, but no one gets into the depths of it. But the mainstream media doesn’t really report on anything big anymore. They literally watch which way the wind blows. And if they can sell advertising Well, one of the companies, cassava sciences, is a pharmaceutical company, the way this story starts is that there were some activist investors who had filed a, a petition with the FDA, concerned about the phase three trials that cassava science was doing for an Alzheimer’s drug. So what is the phase three trial, as I’ve shared before, when a pharmaceutical company creates a drug, first, they do testing and test tubes and animals. And then if that is quote unquote, show success, then they go on to test in humans. Now human testing takes on three different kinds of testing. One is called phase one, phase two, phase three. And the first two types of testing phase one and phase two are small tests to really focus on safety. Phase three, is really about efficacy does this drug work? Okay, so they had come up with a, a drug for Alzheimer’s, based on a certain theoretical framework of science. And cassava, had claimed and cassava was phase three trials. Well, two activist investors were concerned that cassava is science was fraudulent. Okay, so what they did was they went to the FDA and they filed the petition. And this is their filing of the petition which says requests that the FDA halt the current clinical studies of Cemu philam almost sounds like film flimflam, but that was the name of the drug sponsored by cassava sciences pending audits. Of one the publication’s relied on by cassava in support of its scientific claims concerning CMU falam to the IND application for semi films use and Alzheimer’s disease, and three all clinical biomarker studies in CMU, the labs in Alzheimer disease, so these activist investors who also by the way, were to neuroscientists, they were concerned that stuff wasn’t going to work was going to harm people. And the study was going to have about 1800 people. And they wrote to the FDA, okay. And the FDA basically didn’t do anything. Okay, so that was in 2021. And in February 2022, the FDA told these two neuroscientists would file this petition all you know, you’re doing it the wrong way. There’s nothing really here. This is not the way to do it. Okay. So that petition gets buried. However, this would happen. The law firm representing those two investors, hired a very interesting scientists by the name of Matthew Schrag, okay. And Matthew Schrag is an MD PhD. Over at Vanderbilt University. He
himself is a researcher in memory and Alzheimer’s. And he was hired. He was hired to be the expert. You see whenever there’s a lawsuit, or petition, something like this file legally. What happens is typically, attorneys go hire an expert, and the experts job is to do bring to the forefront, an expert report to present to the court. So Schrag was hired by these two neuroscientists, to present evidence that would cassava was doing was really fraudulent. Okay, that was their claim. Okay. So Matthew Schrag Schrag is an MD PhD, he goes, and he starts researching cassava, this pharmaceutical company, which people were concerned, which these two activist investors were confirmed was doing, essentially fraudulent science. But as I mentioned, during that research, the FDA basically set out nothing to see like the petition was filed in the wrong way, some procedural thing, they said this wasn’t the right way to do it. However, what happens is Matthew Schrag as he’s digging through understanding, cassava has claimed for their drug that is going to be effective. Where did they get the science for that? And he digs and digs and digs and he comes across a paper written by a guy called and we’ll get to him lessening and what the less than a paper and here’s the less than a paper. And this was a landmark paper. So you can see the author was Sylvain lessening. And by the way, this is he’s the main author. And the PII by the way, in bio biology papers, when you see this, this was typically the last it’s really not the last author in biology. That person on the last is really the PII. Okay, who ran the research? So Karen ash, Karen’s Zhao hash was his really his boss, so Sylvanas boss was Karen ash right here. Okay. So this paper was published in March 16 2006. All right. Someone says I wish you’d be my PhD supervisor. Sure. Anyway, so this paper said a specific amyloid beta protein assembly in the brain impairs memory. So we’ll get into the science of this. So with this paper in 2006, by Sylvain lessening. And Karen Ash was purporting that they had found a very specific amyloid beta protein assembly and you’ll, it’s the thing that is involved in the assembly of the amyloid beta protein which forms plaques. And that that was the key to impairing memory you see, up until this paper, give you a little bit of history, there was a lot of research. And by the way, here’s Sylveon lessening, there he is, and now he’s still an associate professor at the University of Minnesota. By the way this research, by the way, this paper is done at the University of Minnesota. Ashe was an up and coming scientist. I don’t think she had tenure yet. We’ll talk about tenure. And Sylvain was a PhD student who just joined her lab as a postdoc. So this was a young guy, she, he she was his boss, okay, much older, and much more experienced. Okay, so this paper comes out. And the reason I bring this paper, this was a landmark paper, when that paper came out in 2000, and it’s fix that that literally directed the research of Alzheimer’s for the next 16 years. And minimum, about a quarter of a billion dollars went into this angle of research. And, and indirectly billions went in, okay, billions of American pears tax dollars. And this research was based on Sylvain and ashes were AlexNet and ashes work claiming that they had discovered a particular protein assembly that actually impairs memory in the brain. Okay. So why is this important? Well, the reason this is important, and by the way, I’m sharing right now with you before I get into what is to be done. A author, a investigative reported science is the one who put all this together. This just came out about a week ago. Now what he says and this just a little bit background on Alzheimer’s is the following you say one of the
the biggest mysteries and also the most distinctive feature that he brings up is that that when people get Alzheimer’s, when you open up people’s brains are these things called plaques, PLA K U S, okay. And other protein deposits, and the reason it’s called Alzheimer’s loe, halos, a Lewis Alzheimer was the first who saw this in 1906 in the brain of disease dementia patients. Now in 1984, a beta a capital A beta amyloid beta, was identified a protein was identified as a main component of those plaques. So these plaques are made up of this protein called a beta in 1984. So that’s almost, that’s 78 years later. And then about seven years later, 9091, researchers traced that family linked, so it was genetic Alzheimer’s mutations in the gene for precursor protein from which amyloid derives, okay, so amyloid derives from this other protein. So for many scientists, as he says, it seemed clear that a beta buildup sets off a cascade of damage and dysfunction in neurons, causing dementia. Stopping amyloid deposits became the most plausible therapeutic strategy. So let me just sort of unpack that. So you so 1906, they find these plaques in people’s brain? 1984, they find those plaques are composed of a beta. And then by, you know, the mid 90s, it was decided that the way you’re going to solve Alzheimer, Alzheimer’s is stopped the build up of a beta. Okay, got it. So think about you have a wall, the walls made up of bricks, these bricks are called a beta, okay? And the goal was, if we can stop the accumulation of a beta, then you’re going to stop. Stop. Stop Alzheimer’s, okay. So lots and lots of clinical trials went into this, okay. And, but again, this was all just a theory. The theory was that these plaque formation caused by a beta lead to this and as the science writer writes, he goes hundreds of clinical trials of amyloid targeted therapies yielded few glimmers of promise it wasn’t really working. Only the overwhelming Agilent had gained FDA approvals. There’s only one drug that cannot out of all these, all this work, yet a beta still dominates research and drug development. NIH spent $1.6 billion on projects that mentioned amyloid in this fiscal year. So if you if you simply put amyloid and you were researcher, you got funded, okay? About half of its overall Alzheimer’s funding. So out of the $3.2 billion, or 3 billion, more than half of it went to the theory of a beta scientists who advance other potential Alzheimer’s causes such as immune dysfunction or inflammation complaint they’ve been sidelined by the amyloid mafia I call it the Alzheimer’s academic mafia, but pretty close. So this is what was going on. So this one researcher for say it’s set says the amyloid hypothesis became the scientific equivalent of the Ptolemaic model of the solar system, which is Sun and planets rotate around the Earth. Remember, a lot of people said the Sun rotates around the Earth. So so all of this research was based on amyloid, okay? But people are finding only one drug came out of this and people were starting to question this. And by 2006, between 1991 and 2006, a lot of money went into this by 2006. This was on the centenary, the anniversary centenary of the discovery of the epic discovery of Alzheimer’s. A growing cadre, he says of skeptics wondered aloud, whether the field needed a reset, then a breathtaking Nature paper entered the breach. So, so think about this. The hypothesis was amyloid deposits, starting in 1984 are the reason that you get Alzheimer’s, okay? Okay, so write that down. amyloid deposits which lead to these plaques, so 1984 Lots billions of dollars research go into this. But guess what, they’re not finding any drugs, none of them work. And it’s just a hypothesis. So the field was in complete disarray by 2006, which was the anniversary of the discovery of Alzheimer’s by Eloise Alzheimer’s, and then boom, in 2006. Guess what happens? This paper comes out.
Okay. Paper which I shared earlier, this paper comes out and says, we have the discovery, essentially of the century, which says, We have discovered the way that a the amyloid protein assembly, there’s something that comes before the amyloid protein, it’s called an L Gummer, O Li, G O M er, it’s like the things that the bricks are composed of the amyloid protein. They’re the precursor. And we have proof that this actually impairs memory. And that was what this paper was. This paper was saying that they had found this very specific a beta 56. And I’ll get to that very specific oligomer, which is part of the amyloid beta protein assembly. And they had injected this in mice, and they had shown cognitive decline. No one had ever shown that before. Okay. So 2006 was an important year because this paper by the way, this is a very prestigious journal Nature. Okay. 2006 last night, and ash published his paper, saying they had made the major breakthrough showing that they had found a precursor to the amyloid protein that injected into mice, I think, mice, rats, and it showed cognitive decline when this protein came in, everyone following me. Alright. Good. So again, it’s a lot of stuff to take in. But that’s what occurred less there was a guy showed that. And when he published his paper, he submitted these things called western blots. I’ll do a whole session on western blots. But western blots is an imaging technique that’s used in biology to show how much of a protein is present. And so this guy lesson I said that he had found the A beta star 56 oligomer. And he presented this image, okay, right here. And he said, This band right here represented a beta 56 bands, which showed that this protein, when it was put into mice would cause cognitive decline. Guess what, Schrag discovered on a open website called PubPeer. People are already complaining about less than eight previous images that he had loaded up there on other work. And he found, he tracked that and he found out that were the same similar problems with the images that he had used in that 2006 paper. Now remember, this is all occurring in 2021 15 years later, because he was hired as an expert witness. Okay, so 2021. Schrag finds out that these images have been doctored. Let me explain that he finds out these images, likely put the word likely. And the reason he the pump here, guys showed that the images don’t look real. They were photoshopped, but you only conclusively shade if you had to prove it if you had the original images, but they clearly know that these images are not real based on the image artifacts. Okay. And this has been confirmed multiple times now. So the paper that was submitted in 2006. And by the way, as I speak, you can notice that nature has put this commentary just a week ago on the paper which says Editor’s Note, the editors of nature have been alerted to concerns regarding some of the figures in this paper nature is investigating these concerns, and a further editorial responsive as soon as possible. In the meantime, readers advised a cause to use caution when using results reported hearing well, this is 2022 This paper was published in 2006. Everyone, so took nature the editor 16 years. Okay, meanwhile, that paper was cited 2300 times 2300 times. And because of that paper, this lab I believe, got about $20 million less last night, he started his own lab at the same university got another pie five to 7 million, and then a quarter of a billion to billions of dollars poured into the field because of this research. Okay. And we’re going to talk about why that took place. Why the delay? Alright, so there you go. Now,
the suspicions about this, as a science article says, were raised about less nice research and independent Image Analysis took place, and they and all of these different institutions can they all concur with this overall conclusion, which casts doubt on hundreds of images, including more than 70 and less newspapers. Some look like shockingly blatant examples of image tampering, says Donna Wilcock and Alzheimer’s expert at the University of Kentucky, the authors quote unquote appear to have composed figures by piecing together parts of photos from other experiments photoshopping says Elizabeth built a molecular biologist and well known forensic image consultant. Quote, The other experimental results might not have been the desired results and the day It might have been changed to better fit a hypothesis, you see, they put forward this results. It’s like you put forward the results, and then you go make the data to fit the results. Okay? So what, you know, bad students do in second or third grade. But this is occurring at a major university being published in a major journal called nature. Just think about that. Okay. Someone said, this is very good. Tanya said snake oil on our dime. You’re the only doctor I trust, you are not in farmer’s pocket. All right. So again, by the way, is I mean, just want to let everyone out. You know, it is our movement, truth, freedom and health, which is the only movement that does this as a public service. Because we interconnect science, and the politics and the health issues, you’re not gonna get this anywhere else. And you can’t do this on a, you know, stupid Joe Rogan podcast, because Rogan will come out many years later, or he’ll watch which way the wind blows, you won’t get this on Tucker Carlson you only get this year from our movement. And this research, and the stuff we do here is made possible with your support. And I want all of you guys to become part of this movement, because you’ll understand when we take a systems approach, we can really get to the truth here. Okay. So, so that’s what was taking place. Okay. Now, you have to understand that Karen ash, who’s a lead researcher, she knew in 2000, that people were recognizing that there was these things called oligomers, toxic oligomers, which are subtypes of a beta. As this article said, that dissolve in some bodily fluids had gained currency, as likely the chief culprit in Alzheimer’s, potentially more pathogenic than insoluble plaques, amyloid oligomers had been linked to impaired communication between neurons in vitro and, and in animals. But no one had proved no one had proved that any one of the many oligomers directly caused cognitive decline. Okay, so there was this theory swirling around in 2000, before 2006, hey, there could be these things called a ligament, remember, they’re trying to keep this a beta thing alive, it’s failing miserably. So they say, Oh, these ligaments are the things that directly cause cognitive decline. And they’re a subtype of a beta. Got it? So the A Beta stuff wasn’t working. So they’re saying okay, something else is a subtype of a beta and they call these these toxic oligomers. So that and they said that was another theory. So that was a theory that this guy Sylveon was less than a was brought in from France. So he was a PhD student in France, and he was brought in to the University of Minnesota by ash, okay. I think Helen ash, okay. And this guy is one in the brains of ashes, transgenic mice, these are ash, the main researcher, the UMN team, discovered a previously unknown oligomer dubbed a beta 56 pronounced amyloid beta star 56. After its relatively heavy molecular weight compared with other oligomers, the group isolated a beta 56 and injected it into rats, the rats capacity to recall simple previously learned information, such as the location of a hidden platform and a maze plummeted. So basically, these guys claimed they discovered this a ligament,
which is a toxic oligomer precursor to a beta. And when they injected that into rats, it caused cognitive decline. And this was absolutely you know, breakthrough. Okay. And ash and Sylvan took credit for it. In fact, on their website, as a science article says, Ash touted a beta 56 on our website. This is a main researcher as, quote, The first substance ever identified and brain tissue in Alzheimer’s reshoots that have been shown to cause memory impairment. Personal like this wants to win the Nobel Prize. Okay. And accompanying editorial nature called a beta 56, a star suspect and Alzheimer’s LLC forum, a widely read online hub for the field Titan, titled its coverage, a beta star is born. Okay, so think about let me just take a quick break here to let you know what’s going on. So, the A Beta field was going down, and suddenly in 2006, it gets this big, you know, resuscitation by the discovery of a beta 56 by ash and last night ash again is a main researcher she brings into this young postdoc or PA He guides you do all the hard work. And he’s the one who faked the images as is coming out from the work of Schrag, okay. In fact, no one else has been able to reproduce a beta 56 By the way, since 16 years, and the field just goes on. This is even more interesting, okay. And in fact, Asch won this prestigious prize, and I call a lot as many of these prize insider prizes by the way, you know, they’re all one incestuous clan. Less than two weeks after the papers published, Ash won the prestigious potamkin prize for neuroscience, partly for the work leaving a beta 56. Now, here’s the interesting thing. There are right now at Harvard, right now. Particularly at Harvard, one of the leading Alzheimer’s researchers, he’s running around trying to rescue his own field, because he was part of this stuff, too. And his papers have been born into question, and he’s saying all this paper did not have a big impact. Nothing to see here. Let’s move along. Okay. Well, that’s not true. As as a science guy says, the nature the science paper, the Nature paper has been cited in 2300 scholarly articles, more than all but for Alzheimer’s basic research papers since 2000. This is a fifth most cited paper in Alzheimer’s research. Since then, annual NIH support for studies labeled amyloid oligomer and Alzheimer’s has risen from zero to 287,000,020 21. Lesson A and ash help spark that explosive experts explosion experts say So think about this. Ash. And last night, two researchers at University of Minnesota write this paper in 2006. It gets cited 2300 times which means other people say Oh, this is his research. This is his research, refer to this. All the little amyloid mafia cite this paper bolster the paper and our tax dollars $287 million quarter of a billion dollars gets sent to all these other people. If they put a research grant that said amyloid oligomer and Alzheimer’s so if you were one of these amyloid mafia, academic researchers, and you write a paper saying, Hey, give me some funding, and it had the words amyloid oligomer and Alzheimer’s, you’d more than likely get funding. quarter of a billion dollars went into this because of that paper. Well, guess what? No one has been able to replicate this research. And 16 years later, we find out that the paper was composed of fraudulent images. Okay. Now, as the science author says the paper provided an important boost to the amyloid and toxic oligomer hypothesis which was not working when they face rising doubts sued offset. So think about this. Up until that point $1.6 billion went into the amyloid research 1.6 which is more than half of all of the Alzheimer’s research. You follow me? And and so if you’re a researcher and Alzheimer’s, you’re like shit, excuse my language.
They’re like, wow, our amyloid beta hypothesis ain’t working out. And suddenly, this research comes out by ash in Minnesota. And it’s like reset to resuscitate the whole industry. So all of these amyloid mafia people supported it. Everyone getting the picture. And sawed off says proponents loved it loved it, because it seemed to be an independent validation of what they had been proposing for a long time. It basically gave a boost to the amyloid hypothesis. That was a really big finding that kind of turned the field on its head, partly because of ash is impeccable in premature Wilcox as it drove a lot of other investigators to go looking for these heavier oligomer species. He became now less named, became a leader of humans neuroscience graduate program in 2020. And in May 2022, this just very recently, four months after Schrag delivered his concerns to the NIH. So Schrag who discovered these fake images, wrote a whistleblower report to the National Institute of Health and told the National Institutes of Health, so four months after, okay, so in what’s four months, so surround February, Schrag delivered his concerns February, March, April May Schrag this whistleblower, wrote to the NIH saying, Look, this is all fake data. And even after that, this guy at the University of Minnesota gets rewarded in May of 2022. In fact, he gets a grant from the NIH the coveted r1 grant for five years. I think was up to five to $7 million. Now get this guess who was a program officer who approved this grant, a guy called Austin Yang? Who was a co author on that 2006 paper. Okay, so look at the inside racketeering here. Austin Yang was a co author of the 2006 paper with less name. And with ash. Now he’s over at the NIH, which is where the money is doled out our taxpayer dollars are doled out to the scientists. So Yang is over here at the NIH. He was formerly at the University of Minnesota writing this paper, he’s over at the NIH less than a applies for multimillion dollar grant. And guess who’s a program officer gives him the grant? Yang, okay. And obviously, he declined to comment. This is a racketeering, okay. And it gets even more interesting. People acknowledge so much of our field is not reproducible. So it’s a huge advantage to understand when data streams might not be reliable. Okay. So this is an important point, you do a piece of research. And let’s say I try to duplicate your research and I can’t do it, guess what, my paper will never get published. Okay. My paper will never get published. All right. Why? So over here, a bigwig at Harvard University, Minnesota publishes fake research. I’m in a little state school and I published research, that’s not able to duplicate his results. Because I’m not part of that mafia. They won’t even publish my research. More interestingly, if you prove someone’s research is not correct. The big journals don’t like publishing that paper, you know why? They don’t get hit. They don’t get views. They don’t get citations. Okay. So, negative results, this is really screwed up, never get published. So fake science continues. So if you’re a member of the fake science mafia and you publish research, your other colleagues are going to protect you with literally a mafia. Some guy says, I can’t replicate this research. He’s thrown out. He’s never published, you probably want him to get tenure. Okay. All right. Now, the reality is that many, many people were saying that they weren’t able to duplicate this research. In fact, as this shows, in the 16 years following the landmark paper, Lester Nash separately or jointly published many articles on their stellar logMAR, yet only a handful of other groups have reported even detecting this, but many of this detection it was found is also based on those false images. Okay. Now, what’s interesting is one of the professors who work with less names in France, a guy called Vivian said that when he worked in France, when he was a PhD student, he was doing image manipulation back then, and he he retracted a paper. So this guy, Lesson Eight, has been a fake scientist for a long time.
He gets brought into University of Minnesota, Ashe wants to make her name win the Nobel Prize. She’s the one who brought him in. And she’s the one who made 27 million bucks to her own lab. And less nice bringing made another 5 million in the industry, the Alzheimer mafia, made of a quarter of a billion to probably $1.6 billion who paid for all that? You did. You paid for all of that research your tax dollars. Now. Now I’m going to get in to explaining to you why this occurs. The big point I want you to understand is no one in academia ever pays. They get all this research dollars and build their nice homes and Cape Cod. They get there. They go on their ski trips. They all hang out together because they’re a bunch of incestuous dirtbags most of these people. That’s why I do that’s why we do our own research. That’s why we have our own movement. Because the bottom line is science is compromised. And think about what science is. And I just want you guys to think back in the old days, there was the academic the priesthood, they called it the priesthood. It said, no, no, no, the sun goes around the Earth. Galileo showed otherwise and he was vilified for that. Okay. The academic priesthood is the same priesthood. Let’s say you find an amazing herb that only that cost nothing and you say know what, this can cure Alzheimer’s or this or x or whatever you find, okay. Well, if that’s not going to make money, and you try To publish a paper on it, you will be called a snake oil salesman, you will be called a fraud, and you’ll be destroyed. But these kinds of people are allowed to prosper for 16 years. And you know what, nothing will happen to them. Because every 10 years, some major academic fraud occurs. And nothing happens to these guys. Okay, the university may kick them out, but the government never claws back and gets our money back. Where’s the January 6 committee on this? So I’m doing this video today. And I hope you share it widely to educate people. And this diagram will tell you, and this is as an insider, this is how so this is the racket that goes on. Okay, let me tell you the real racket now, this is a real racket. Take some notes, the real racket in science, okay. You finish your PhD, and brain research. Well, what’s your next job, your job is either to go to industry and start your own pharmaceutical company. Your job may be to go into academia and try to become a professor. It is rare that people like myself, don’t participate in that and build a bottoms up movement. Because guys like me, should either be over here or here. But I chose not to do that, because I understood the racketeering here. So you come out with your PhD, and let’s say you want to become a professor, this is what happens in order to become a professor, a tenured professor. So you join initially as a low level professor, and you have seven years, write this down, you have seven years to do research, to get your tenure. What is tenure? What is tenure, tenure means that after, once you get tenure at a university, you never have to do any work. You get paid. You’re a lifetime employee at that university lifetime, you can just sit on your ass and do nothing. And you will still get be paid money. It is like judges. It’s like the judicial system. There’s only two industries in the world where you can sit on your ass and never have to do any work. The judicial branch and the academic world. These are feudal systems, which means they go back to the medieval times. Academics are not even democratic. They’re like fiefdoms. Okay? These guys are the actual priesthood. Okay? So you get your seven years comes up. So think about now all of you if you’re listening carefully, you’ve done seven years. Let’s say you’re an Alzheimer’s researcher or a cancer researcher. Now you get put before your universities committee tenure committee, they’re going to decide if we’re going to give you tenure. Okay? And how do they decide if they’re gonna give you a tenure? They look at your research. Well, what do they do? They look at what papers you’ve
published. Okay, you publish a lot of papers, that’s only one step. The second step is, have your papers been referenced by other people? Okay, if your papers have been referenced by other people, that means you’re having an impact in the field. So if you wrote one paper, or let’s say you wrote 100 papers, and no one else referenced it, you get a big zero. But if you wrote one paper and 10,000 other people reference your paper, that means if you’re playing fair, wow, that’s a pretty big paper, like Einstein wrote the theory of relativity got referenced by everyone, okay. But what happens in this racketeering is you publish a paper, and it’s what happens? You’re really trained to go kiss ass to all the other people do all sorts of actual kissing ass to, you know, figuratively, and literally the stories I could tell you, okay. And this incestuous, you become part of the mafia. But if you don’t choose to play, and there are people by the way, a few people don’t play have great respect. And there’s an they still have tenure. But this game, by and large is for the people kiss ass. So or you fake science. So you publish a paper. And in this case, this was referenced 2300 times. Ash gets tenure. Last name probably got tenure. I have to look that up. 2300 citations and you save the field so all your other researchers who you also Reference and they referenced you. There’s all this referencing going on back and forth because everyone’s kissing each other’s ass. And I hate to use that word, but that is what it is. It’s academia is one of the biggest ask kissing environments. And that’s why academics are so quick. When real research comes from the outside, not in their realm. They want to attack it like the invention of email. Look, I invented email before I came to MIT. And I never spoke about it when it went into the Smithsonian, who created this huge hullabaloo because it wasn’t created by their mafia. We can talk we’ll do a whole story on that. But I’ve been before MIT, I’ve invented things and after, so I can see these two worlds. But this existing academic mafia doesn’t want knowledge, or new science or new innovation coming from outside. That’s why they go call that stuff snake oil, and they attack everyone else. But they are a mafia, and how are they a mafia? This is how they exactly wicked nepotism. Amelia, you nailed it. And this is how that nepotism works. Okay? So you become an editor of a journal. So you’re sitting here, you’re also the head of the department, or the head of some group, like a head of a lab like Ash. And you also sit at the NIH, who is the NIH, NIH is the National Institutes of Health. And so they have a billion dollars, and they’re going to fund research. Well, how do they decide to fund research? So you’re a researcher like ash or Lesnar, or somebody else, so you have a pile of money? They’re gonna find you. Well, who makes that decision? Guess who sits on the NIH study groups? The same people who are the heads of departments are the same people sitting on the NIH study groups? Well, these same people are also the heads of the big journals. Government is sitting here watching all this and ever does anything. So the NIH study group gives funding 70 80% of the funding goes to the heads of departments of the major universities. And these heads of departments are also the journal editors, by and large if you look at it, okay, so it’s one incestuous freak show. It’s a mafia. So the Alzheimer’s people who are deciding where the money goes, are the same people are heads of the departments that also received the money. Okay. Want to thank Suresh for his donation. Thank you very much, Suresh. It’ll go to our movement. Sir. I says, Hi, time, we support ourselves by building a bottoms up movement through through health for ourselves, our family or community. Are you ready to fight for you wake up? Yeah. Thanks, Suresh. So, we want you to wake up because no one has taught you this. Only our movement will teach you this racketeering and science. So all these people who are getting the journals published or they get tenure are the same people or heads of the department, or the same people sitting on the NIH study groups, by and large, not in all cases, but by and large, okay, more than 50% of the cases if you go analyze this, so it’s one big racket. And by the way, when I met with Trump, I told him as he goes, Oh, I wish I had known this before. The presidents either are stupid, or they know about this, or they’re part of the incestuous behavior.
So what is to be done? That was the other thing I want to do what is to be done? Well, I would say the first thing that needs to be done is that money that all of these researchers got should be paid back, they should sell their summer homes, they should go bankrupt, they should pay what is different between these guys. And a poor guy who goes and steals some bread. What is the difference? And go look at the history of the signs frauds occur, and nothing happens to these guys. Nothing happens to them. No criminal charges are filed. Nothing happens to them. And this is why science moves so slow, because you have the collusion of Big Pharma, big academia, big science, big government, one big incestuous cesspool. And by the way, they’re all friends with big Hollywood. Many of these people are what I call star fuckers excuse the term. That’s what they are.
Big academia, the system of big academia is this that you’re seeing here? So why what is the why does this occur? What goes back to tenure, your professor, you got seven years to get tenure, you got seven years to get tenure. And then you don’t have to work ever again. You get a paycheck, you never have to work again. The tenure system must be eliminated. Any federally funded universities tenure must be gone. We must end the tenure system. It’s an old medieval system. Just like we must end, you know, judgeships and Supreme Court 10 years two, they’re the two institutions in the world right now, which are from feudal times. They’re undemocratic, completely corrupt systems. And look at this corruption, this collusion and these are the people I create fake science, and they make sure that the fake science is protected. And that fake science results in fake medicines, which results in destroying people’s health. This is the reality. So if you peel away all the layers, peel away the layer of Big Pharma, you will come to big academia, Big Pharma cannot exist without the fake science, ladies and gentlemen, it can’t. So, I’ll do a follow up on this tomorrow, I have to go to our 7pm Truth, freedom and health talk. And I can’t overemphasize to all of you listening, you guys have to become truth, freedom and health warrior scholars, you have to contribute to our movement, you can give $1 You can give $20 You can give nothing, but become a part of it. Give your time, share these videos, because when you go to truth, freedom and health.com go listen to the video. And you will realize that you can give whatever you want truth, freedom, health.com contribute. But when you contribute, we give you gifts so you can learn more. It’s not about taking, it’s always about giving, giving, giving, giving. That’s what our movement does. It gives to you the knowledge of systems, if you want to, and you get to take the system science course, you get to be part of this community, you can just support us. But we need to build our movement or just become a member. Don’t give us anything. But we need to build our movement, we need to show how the attack on freedom hurts science, how that hurts truth how that hurts your health,
I have to go to our I’m going to be jumping on to this right now. At 8pm. Tonight, we’ll have our orientation, where we teach people the importance of building a bottoms up movement. That’s what we need to do, we need to build a bottoms up movement for truth, freedom and health. And before I go, I’m going to play you our anthem video. And I’ll be back to wrap up. But let me play this we have allowed our country to be taken over from within. And the end goal is you will have a homogenized world where we will become slaves. Because there is a condition among the elites that really thinks they’re better than you. Deep down inside them that you don’t deserve the freedoms you have. They don’t this reality is what people need to wake up to. And we need to all unite working people, there is only one movement that can do that. That is the movement that we started creating here messages the movement for truth, freedom. And look, I’ve been a student of politics since I was a four year old kid setting revolutionary movements left wing right wing, there is a physics there’s a nuclear science to destroying the establishment. To build a bridge, you need to understand Newton’s equation, you need to understand the laws of gravity, you need to understand Poissons ratio, there is a way to build a revolution. And that’s why I put this together. My goal is to train a army of truth freedom and health leaders. We don’t need followers on social media, we need leaders, but they they need training because educational system does not teach them history, nothing. So in three hours, that’s what I’ve started doing. That’s the solution. We got to train people. First with understanding what a system is. The second is understanding the interconnection between truth, freedom and health. Freedom is the ability to move freely communicate freely, right talk freely. Without freedom. You cannot convert ideas, hypothesis into truth, which is science. And without freedom, you can’t really get to truth and without truth. You make up fake problems and fake solutions, which means you destroy our health. And without health, which is the infrastructure of us in our body. You can’t fight for freedom. Third concept is it has to be bottoms up working people, people who work uniting. And what the right wing has done is whatever you say working people unite that must be communist. Meanwhile, they’ve let the Democrats run unions which suppress workers completely corrupt. But when you look at the arc of American history, it’s been when working people came up, we need to go local. Every solution I’m coming up with as a part of this movement. We’re giving the science which is a truth. And then we tell people what they can do on the ground. Like with election fraud. You don’t need to wait for some lawyer. Our goal is to train people need to go local to go local to go local fight locally. Forget lawyers, forget politicians, forget celebrities, you’ve got to learn politics, and there is a science to it. They lock us down we should be ready to shut them down. And the fourth part of this principle is a not so obvious establishment. So when you look at a system there’s always something that disturbs you from getting to your goal when the biggest disturbances the not so obvious establishment, which are those people who claim there for you on the left and the right, the Al Sharpton to tell black people I’m for you. The Tucker Carlson’s. Do you think any true anti establishment person will ever be on Fox or CNN? I don’t think so. They both mislead working people back into the establishment without this solid understanding of Political physics and theory, you’re screwed. You’re going to follow on the left wing Bernie Sanders Oh, he said something or Robert Kennedy, scumbags? Are you going to follow you know, some right wing talk show host. They’re not going to lead us deliberation, it’s us. And that political physics, it’s a nuclear science of change. Bottoms up. We have to organize to understand that there is people who talk a good game, and then look at what they actually do left and right. I’m sorry, Sean Hannity may say some good things, but I don’t see the urgency in his voice to get something done. And it can only come when you weaponize yourself with the right knowledge, you need to be able to identify a rat. You know, Christ didn’t go after the Romans, right. It was the Pharisees and the Sadducees, who screwed him up his own quote, unquote, people. And that’s where we’re at. So these four concepts are built into a curriculum, people can go to bat shiva.com. And it’s an educational program, we need to train people in political theory, you need to have physics, and I’ve created that curriculum. People need to get educated, we need to get educated fast. And within half an hour, an hour, I can teach people two years of MIT control systems, I teach people those concepts that I apply it, anyone can understand it. And then you say, Oh, I gotta build a bottoms up movement. They have to get politically astute. And then they have to go locally and act not sit there on social media, they have to act locally, defy locally, do civil obedience locally, but with knowledge on how to build a movement, the Senate campaigns expanded to the movement for truth, freedom and health. And they can find it on V as in Victor,
a Shiva, V A shiva.com. So people can sign into it can get access to a bunch of videos, if they want to take a course and become a truth freedom health leader, I offer a full scholarship there. But we want people to make a commitment that they’ll study that they’ll get certified that they’ll go do activities on the ground. So go to VI A Shiva victory, America, Shiva ba shiva.com.
So anyway, I encourage all of you to come to our orientation that we do. Leben AM, which we had earlier this morning, or 8pm. Just go to VA shiva.com/orientation. And sign up. Look, our movement, really, as we just did with this Alzheimer’s thing. One is what the science reporter shared, but we have shared with you what most people do not know, which won’t be unfortunately talked about in the media, is this racketeering enterprise of the relation between the journal editors to heads of departments and the NIH, basically, the fox in the henhouse, and all places, the same guy who’s here is here and here. So all their papers get published, all their research gets funded, and they’re running their departments. So they get their own funding. So you saw here, or it’s their friend, you know, one degree of freedom away in this case, Yang is over here. He was a funding officer at the government he funded is less than a who he was an author with over here. Okay, so it’s all one begins and says, show us shithole. Okay. And I have to use some of these unfortunate terms, because it’s the best way to describe it. Because we have given way too much respect to this in sensuousness. So I’ve thought about what you guys think about this putting up a petition, we’ll put it up on our website shortly. That and we’re going to basically, I’ll frame it on what is to be done. We need to end tenure, these people need to pay back their money. But is it because they’re academics that they get, they get a higher caste system? Look, I grew up in India, which had the caste system. They had the Brahmins. Well, now we have the professors are the judges, particularly we’re talking about professors here. Very few I don’t I know very little professors who get brought up in front of a criminal committee and have to pay back all their money, clawback their money. That’s what needs to be done. So we will follow up with this tomorrow, maybe we’ll even do a roundtable on this. But we as a movement, need to provide the leadership which we will to really solve this incestuous behavior among these academics, so keep an eye out for that. I have to head out to our to our orientation, but I welcome all of you, in closing, to be a part of this movement, you can be a part by going right to Truth for them. help.com you can contribute. When you contribute, we give you many gifts, Warrior gifts, word or gifts, or you don’t have to give anything, just go here and become a member. If you want to contribute you just click this link here. And your contributions you can give $1 You can give no dollars, but when you give support, we give you knowledge and further education gifts and books and etc. Okay, so we’re better than public broadcasting in the sense okay. We give you knowledge that’s independent of big academia big science. Anyway, I hope all of you show up at the orientation. I hope you guys support what this is your movements to support it for your own advancement. Thank you everyone be well. We’ll be back tomorrow.
It’s time we move beyond the Left vs. Right, Republican vs. Democrat. It’s time YOU learn how to apply a systems approach to get the Truth Freedom Health you need and deserve. Become a Truth Freedom Health® Warrior.
Join the VASHIVA community – an integrated EDUCATIONAL, COMMUNICATIONS – independent of Big Tech -, and LOCAL ACTIVISM platform to empower YOU to actualize Truth Freedom Health in your local communities by employing a SYSTEMS APPROACH.
The platform we are building for Truth Freedom Health® provides the infrastructure to take on Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Academia. Many of you have asked how you can help. You can contribute whatever you can. Based on your level of commitment to get educated, I have also created some wonderful educational gifts to thank you for your contribution.
To get the education you need and deserve, join Dr.SHIVA on his Foundations of Systems course. This course will provide you three pillars of knowledge with the Foundation of Systems Thinking. The three pillars include: 1) The System Dynamics of Truth Freedom Health, 2) The Power of a Bottom’s Up Movement, and 3) The Not So Obvious Establishment. In this course, you will also learn fundamental principles of all systems including your body.
Course registration includes access to his LIVE Monday training, access to the Your Body, Your System tool, four (4) eBooks including the bestselling System and Revolution, access to the Systems Health portal and communications tools – independent of Big Tech – including a forum and social media for you to build community with other Truth Freedom Health Warriors.
This course is available online for you to study at your own pace.
It’s time to Get Educated, or Be Enslaved.
The post Dr.SHIVA LIVE: BREAKING – HOW Alzheimer’s #FakeScience ACADEMIC MAFIA Stole Billions. They MUST Pay. appeared first on VASHIVA.