While much of the country has been focused on the attempt by Democrats to fundamentally transform the United States into something we no longer recognized, the drumbeats of war have been sounding both in the Middle East as well as in East Asia.
With that being said, is there really a possibility that after years of relative peace we may soon see not one, but two major conflicts break out?
As noted in Survival Magazine, the run-up to most wars usually don’t come unexpectedly, with there usually being a clear warning of upcoming hostilities. As the author notes, we are seeing an analogous situation today.
One area where it is clear something is about to blow is the Middle East, with Israel and Iran saber rattling.
For example, there have been a number of what are referred to as “mystery explosions” occurring in Iran, and Israeli commercial ships have likewise been targeted.
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out who is causing those explosions in Iran as well as who is attacking the Israel ships. The author notes there has been something of a “shadow war” occurring for years between the two sides and it is only a matter of time before a true conflict starts.
That may be expedited with Iran’s rapidly increasing focus on weaponizing uranium.
In East Asia as well, China has become increasingly bold in its intimidation of Taiwan, and one would have to be naïve not to realize that it is not a matter of if but when that China invades Taiwan.
The Chinese Communist Party is obsessed with “reunifying” the two countries and China has become increasingly bold with sending military aircraft into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ).
In addition, Chinese leader Xi Jinping has indicated that the Taiwan situation will not be “passed down to the next generation.” In other words, Xi has big plans for the island nation.
While the U.S. must be aware (that is if they’re not too busy trying to morph the military into a laboratory of wokeness) that China is ready to do something. Last week that aggressiveness spiked with the Chinese military dispatching 77 aircraft into the Taiwanese ADIZ.
That aggressiveness has led a British publication, the Express, to warn that China and Taiwan “are on the brink of war.”
After the Chinese aggression last weekend, the head of Taiwan’s government slammed the Xi regime:
“China has been wantonly engaged in military aggression, damaging regional peace,” said Premier Su Tseng-Chang Saturday. He also reminded the United States that his country is depending on assistance from the U.S. in dealing with China.
“The U.S. commitment to Taiwan is rock solid and contributes to the maintenance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and within the region,” Su said. “We will continue to stand with friends and allies to advance our shared prosperity, security, and values and deepen our ties with Democratic Taiwan.
The Hill reported that State Department spokesman Ned Price expressed concern about China’s aggression.
‘The United States is very concerned by the People’s Republic of China’s provocative military activity near Taiwan, which is destabilizing, risks miscalculations, and undermines regional peace and stability. We urge Beijing to cease its military, diplomatic, and economic pressure and coercion against Taiwan,” he said in a statement.
All of this puts the United States in a major quandary, with China recognizing the weakness of the U.S. as demonstrated in our bungled withdrawal from Afghanistan, as well as the clear cognitive disability of Joe Biden.
One would have to be clueless not to realize that Xi will assess America’s commitment to Taiwan. Clearly, if China does decide to invade, that would put the United States and China on a war footing.
China had at one time hoped a peaceful reunification with Taiwan much as what was accomplished with Hong Kong, however that ship has sailed. Now, leaders of the Chinese Communist Party know they have a golden opportunity, with a feckless Biden and a divided U.S. This may, as the Survival Magazine piece notes, be the best opportunity for China to “pull the trigger.”
Obviously, any such conflict would throw the entire world, already reeling from the coronavirus pandemic into a further state of chaos.
Meanwhile in the Middle East as Survival Magazine addresses, “the game of nuclear chicken that Iran and Israel are playing is rapidly approaching the moment of truth.”
As with former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, current Israeli PM Naftali Bennett has no patience for Iran developing nuclear weapons and said exactly that in a speech to the UN General Assembly last week. From the Times of Israel:
In his speech to the UN General Assembly last week, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett declared that “Iran’s nuclear program has hit a watershed moment, and so has our tolerance. Words do not stop centrifuges from spinning…we will not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon.”
With quite dramatic candor, meanwhile, IDF Chief of Staff Aviv Kohavi publicly declared (in January) that the IDF was preparing fresh “operational plans” for a potent military strike; (in August) that Iran’s nuclear progress has prompted the IDF “to speed up its operational plans,” with a fresh budget to do so; and (in September) that the IDF has “greatly accelerated” preparations for action against Iran’s nuclear program.
Clearly, it is only a matter of time before the two sides engage in armed conflict, which would also throw the rest of the world into global chaos. As a matter of fact, a top official in Iran has already more or less confirmed that the “war with Israel has already started”:
“The war with Israel has already started,” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh told Maariv. “Israel has carried out attacks that were intended to destroy our nuclear program for peaceful purposes. It murdered nuclear scientists and harmed the Iranian people. Iran is accused of terrorism, but there is no good or bad terrorist. The whole crisis in the region is Israel’s fault.
All of this is of course speculative, but not out of the realm of possibility. We’ve already seen a disruption in the global supply chain in the aftermath of covid, and if either one or both of these two conflicts took place, it would have a significant impact on global financial markets as well.
After being involved in what some called a “20-year war” in Afghanistan (although the last several years has hardly been a “war” as much as it’s been a peacekeeping mission), Americans surely have war fatigue. Getting involved in another war now would go over like a lead balloon.
An invasion of Taiwan by China would more than likely force the United States into the conflict, while a war between Israel and Iran would require the U.S. to get involved, with Israel being our primary ally.
Will either or both of these two wars take place? Who knows? But it almost seems inevitable and if they do, things will get unbelievably bad, very quickly. And with Biden in the White House? Very ugly.
o you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters? Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you. Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories. Click to check it out.
For our previous reporting on the situation between China and Taiwan, we invite you to:
TAIWAN – Reportedly two dozen Chinese military aircrafts penetrated Taiwan’s air defense identification zone, ADIZ, earlier in September, prompting Taiwan to deploy anti-aircraft missiles to track the military aircrafts.
This marks at lest the second occurrence of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force invading the airspace in September, with reports noting that China has been repeatedly violating Taiwan’s ADIZ over the past year.
Over two dozen Chinese fighter jets, four bombers, and one surveillance aircraft intruded into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ) on Thursday (Sept. 23)https://t.co/p5oeAPh4Xy
— INTELSky (@Intel_Sky) September 23, 2021
There were two reported incursions by the Chinese PLAAF on September 23rd that violated the ADIZ, with the first instance occurring at approximately 4:30 p.m. that afternoon. Taiwan News noted that the first round consisted of 19 aircrafts penetrating the southwestern corner of the ADIZ, which the outlet reported the aircrafts as follows:
“12 Shenyang J-16 fighter jets, two Shaanxi Y-8 anti-submarine warfare (Y-8 ASW) planes, two Xian H-6 bombers, one Shaanxi Y-8 electronic warfare aircraft (Y-8 EW), and two Shenyang J-11 fighter jets.”
The second incursion transpired hours later at approximately 7:15 p.m., noting that five additional aircrafts entered the same airspace within the ADIZ, with Taiwan News noting the following aircrafts were among the second breach:
“[T]wo Shenyang J-16 fighter jets, one Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early warning and control aircraft (KJ-500 AEW&C), and two Shenyang J-11 fighters.”
This intrusion upon Taiwan’s airspace comes just one day after news spread that Taiwan had submitted an application to partake in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, also known as the CPTPP.
Some are speculating that the actions taken by China on September 24th were in direct response to Taiwan’s submitted application to participate in the aforementioned trade group – essentially a means to intimidate Taiwan out of the effort or perhaps sway others to reject Taiwan’s application for the CPTPP.
— Gregory D. Evans (@GregoryDEvans) September 23, 2021
Interestingly, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian spoke with Japan’s Kyodo News one day prior to the display of force in Taiwan, mentioning China’s opposition to Taiwan getting involved in trade groups and agreements:
“There is only one China in the world, and the Taiwan region is an inalienable part of China’s territory. The one-China principle is a universally recognized norm governing international relations and the consensus of the international community.
China firmly opposes all official interactions between Taiwan and any country, firmly rejects Taiwan’s accession to any agreement or organization of official nature. China’s position on this issue is clear.”
In a statement from Taiwan’s Foreign Ministry in response to Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian’s noting of China’s stance, Taiwan’s Foreign Ministry referred to China as being a “bully” and that China has “no right to speak” on what trade efforts Taiwan embarks upon:
“The Chinese government only wants to bully Taiwan in the international community, and is the arch criminal in increased hostility across the Taiwan Strait.”
Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters? Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you. Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories. Click to check it out.
Nationwide call explodes for Gen. Mark Milley to be court martialed for treason, working with China to undermine Trump
(Originally published September 15th, 2021)
WASHINGTON, DC- In normal times with a legitimate, unbiased press, there would be no question about the seriousness of allegations made against Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, who is alleged to have directly and purposefully attempted to undermine President Trump, then serving as commander in chief.
Unfortunately, such a press in general does not exist. More so, Democrats are more interested in pushing their radical Marxist agenda than protecting the integrity of the Office of the President of the United States.
Republicans however are apoplectic after the allegations made by journalists Bob Woodward (of Watergate fame) and Robert Costa in their upcoming book, Peril. According to that book, Milley believed that the then-president would “go rogue” and proceeded to work behind the scenes, in concert with our number one enemy—China—to undermine President Trump.
Milley worked two “back-channel phone calls” according to Breitbart, with China’s top general and said he would inform him (commonly called treason) if for some reason Trump was going to launch an attack on that country.
“You and I have known each other for now five years. If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise,” Milley is alleged to have told the Chinese general.
These allegations now have at least two senators calling for Milley to either step down, be fired or in the case of Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), court martialed.
On Tuesday, Paul called for Milley’s removal if the allegations made in the book are proved to be true.
“I don’t care what you think of President Trump, the Chairman of the JCOS [Joint Chiefs of Staff] working to subvert the military chain of command and collude with China is exactly what we do not accept from military leaders in our country. He should be court martialed if true.
Couple that with his inept handling of the withdrawal from Afghanistan, and it is clear General Milley is no longer fit to serve as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and should be removed immediately.”
Couple that with his inept handling of the withdrawal from Afghanistan, and it is clear General Milley is no longer fit to serve as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and should be removed immediately.
— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) September 15, 2021
In addition to Paul, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) called for Milley to resign. Breitbart reported that in a letter written and released on Tuesday, Rubio suggested that Joe Biden “dismiss” Milley immediately, and charged that by his actions.
Milley undermined former President Trump by planning to commit treason.
I write with grave concern regarding recent reporting that General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, worked to actively undermine the sitting Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces and contemplated a treasonous leak of classified information to the Chinese Communist Party in advance of a potential armed conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). These actions by General Milley demonstrate a clear lack of sound judgment, and I urge you to dismiss him immediately.
In his letter, Rubio noted that in speaking to our enemy, “Milley interfered with America’s civilian-controlled military, which could possibly ‘lead to war.’”
I do not need to tell of you the dangers posed by senior military officers leaking classified information on U.S. military operations, but I will underscore that such subversion undermines the President’s ability to negotiate and leverage one of this nation’s instruments of national power in his interaction with foreign nations.
Even more egregiously, reports indicate that General Milley interfered with the procedures by which the civilian commander-in-chief can order a nuclear strike. He purportedly instructed officials not to take orders without his involvement and forced them to take an oath to that effect. A senior military officer interfering with that civilian-controlled process is simply unacceptable at best, and at worst, would cause ambiguity which could lead to war.
General Milley has attempted to rationalize his reckless behavior by arguing that what he perceived as the military’s judgment was more stable than its civilian commander. It is a dangerous precedent that could be asserted at any point in the future by General Milley or others. It threatens to tear apart our nation’s longstanding principle of civilian control of the military.
I hope reports of Gen. Milley reaching out to his Chinese counterpart to undermine a sitting President is proven false
Because if this is true it wasn’t an act of patriotic heroism
It was an act of treachery that posed a grave risk to our security & our constitutional order pic.twitter.com/vvLE5gtN8j
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) September 15, 2021
Lest anyone think this is strictly a partisan issue, former U.S. Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman (yes, that Alexander Vindman) says that through his actions, Milley had “usurped civilian authority.”
“If this is true, GEN Milley must resign. He usurped civilian authority, broke Chain of Command, and violated the sacrosanct principle of civilian control over the military. It’s an extremely dangerous precedent. You can’t simply walk away from that,” Vindman tweeted.
If this is true GEN Milley must resign. He usurped civilian authority, broke Chain of Command, and violated the sacrosanct principle of civilian control over the military. It’s an extremely dangerous precedent. You can’t simply walk away from that. #dotherightthingintherightway https://t.co/izsMMCFPrz
— Alexander S. Vindman (@AVindman) September 14, 2021
The CJCS always has the ability to resign rather than implement a awful or unlawful order. What is described here is wrong. Also, no one person is indispensable. There are a half dozen Chief ready to step into that role. There is no “deep state” but this narrative feeds into one.
— Alexander S. Vindman (@AVindman) September 14, 2021
Aside from the two U.S. Senators, several members of the House also called for Milley’s ouster.
Rep. Chris Stewart (R-UT) tweeted:
“If the reports about General Milley are true, he needs to be relieved of his duties. There’s no justification for secret communication with our greatest adversary. There’s no justification for treason.
@POTUS: If this is verified, you need to immediately dismiss General Milley.”
If the reports about General Milley are true, he needs to be relieved of his duties. There’s no justification for secret communication with our greatest adversary. There’s no justification for treason.@POTUS: If this is verified, you need to immediately dismiss General Milley.
— Rep. Chris Stewart (@RepChrisStewart) September 14, 2021
Rep. Justin Amash (L-MI) said that Milley had betrayed his oath:
“We must preserve civilian control of the Armed Forces, through the president, as our Constitution requires. Any official who subverts this system should not be in office. Anyone concerned about an unfit president can seek a constitutional remedy; anything else betrays their oath.”
We must preserve civilian control of the Armed Forces, through the president, as our Constitution requires. Any official who subverts this system should not be in office. Anyone concerned about an unfit president can seek a constitutional remedy; anything else betrays their oath. https://t.co/ce6tFpS07Z
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) September 14, 2021
Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-CO) tweeted:
“I am astounded by the extraordinary lack of judgment by Gen. Milley & his willingness to compromise our national security & risk American lives. If Milley really did coordinate with his counterparts in the #CCP, behind the back of the President, he should be relieved of duty.”
I am astounded by the extraordinary lack of judgment by Gen. Milley & his willingness to compromise our national security & risk American lives. If Milley really did coordinate with his counterparts in the #CCP, behind the back of the President, he should be relieved of duty.
— Rep. Doug Lamborn (@RepDLamborn) September 14, 2021
According to Newsweek, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is also calling for Milley’s court martial if the allegations are true.
In a tweet, she wrote:
“Court-martial Mark Milley.”
Court-martial Mark Milley.
— Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) September 15, 2021
Finally, Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) accused Milley of treason:
“TREASON! Today’s news adds to the long list of why Milley must go IMMEDIATELY! If this is true, he needs to be prosecuted, tried, and sentenced to the FULLEST extent of the law. NOTHING LESS! Colluding with our ENEMIES to undermine the President is TRAITOROUS!”
TREASON! Today’s news adds to the long list of why Milley must go IMMEDIATELY! If this is true, he needs to be prosecuted, tried, and sentenced to the FULLEST extent of the law. NOTHING LESS! Colluding with our ENEMIES to undermine the President is TRAITOROUS!
— Ronny Jackson (@RonnyJacksonTX) September 15, 2021
Newsweek said they reached out to the Joint Chiefs for comment on the accusations against Milley and Republican calls for him to be ousted and had yet to receive a response.
Military.com addressed the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which spells out three different levels of court-martial. The most serious is a general court martial under which a convicted person can be sentenced to death.
“The accused has a right to be represented by a free military attorney or may hire their own civilian lawyer,” the website noted. “A general court-martial may deliver any punishment not prohibited by the UCMJ, including death when specifically authorized.”
Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.